Comments on: First NuffNang Cheque http://www.hanneng.net/2008/06/18/first-nuffnang-cheque/ Whatever and Anything Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:44:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: hanneng http://www.hanneng.net/2008/06/18/first-nuffnang-cheque/#comment-11436 hanneng Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:37:46 +0000 http://www.hanneng.net/?p=147#comment-11436 Many US-based Internet advertising media companies uses PayPal for payment, and minimum payout is as low as $10. If US-based Internet media companies can do that, why can't local companies do the same? Many US-based Internet advertising media companies uses PayPal for payment, and minimum payout is as low as $10.

If US-based Internet media companies can do that, why can’t local companies do the same?

]]> By: sotong http://www.hanneng.net/2008/06/18/first-nuffnang-cheque/#comment-11435 sotong Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:30:15 +0000 http://www.hanneng.net/?p=147#comment-11435 Silly, why would they want setup any bank transfer facility to allow you to withdraw money easily? They want to make it more difficult for you to withdraw. The more difficult it is for you, the longer the money stays in their coffer. The longer the money stays in their coffer, the longer they can use the money for other purposes or even put it into their own pocket and treat it like their wages. So when time comes to pay you a few months later, they would had made more money and could had use those money to pay you or those money that belongs to you had made them more money and had generated enough investment elsewhere. If you noticed, Advertlets had also use this method. Infact it's widely used by many other companies. It's sheer exploitation. I'm surprise there isn't a body setup to regulate such a relationship between payers and payees. Silly, why would they want setup any bank transfer facility to allow you to withdraw money easily? They want to make it more difficult for you to withdraw. The more difficult it is for you, the longer the money stays in their coffer. The longer the money stays in their coffer, the longer they can use the money for other purposes or even put it into their own pocket and treat it like their wages. So when time comes to pay you a few months later, they would had made more money and could had use those money to pay you or those money that belongs to you had made them more money and had generated enough investment elsewhere.

If you noticed, Advertlets had also use this method. Infact it’s widely used by many other companies. It’s sheer exploitation. I’m surprise there isn’t a body setup to regulate such a relationship between payers and payees.

]]>